At a glance

A practical question set for your review consultation after a cycle that did not work, organised by purpose so you leave with a clear record, an explanation you understand and realistic next steps.

A review consultation after a cycle that did not work is most useful when it produces three things: an accurate record of what happened, an explanation you actually understand, and a clear sense of what could change next time. The question list below is organised by purpose rather than by topic, so you can work through it in order and notice where an answer is still missing.

Write your questions down before you go, leave space for answers, and take the list into the room. It is reasonable to ask a licensed clinician about your diagnosis, your options, the risks discussed, your reports and your individual chances; those are clinical questions and belong in this conversation.

Before the appointment: assemble the factual record

Much of a good review depends on having the details to hand. Ask the clinic for a written cycle summary in advance, or request it at the start of the meeting. Useful items include:

  • Dates of the cycle, including start of stimulation, trigger, retrieval and transfer.
  • The stimulation protocol used, with medication names and doses, and any changes made mid-cycle.
  • Number of eggs retrieved, how many were mature, how many fertilised, and how many reached each development stage.
  • Embryo grading as recorded at the time, and how many embryos were transferred, frozen or not kept.
  • How the lining was prepared for transfer, and any findings noted during the cycle.
  • Any test results from the cycle, including hormone levels and, where relevant, genetic testing reports.

If you have records from earlier cycles or from another clinic, bring those too. A dated folder, paper or digital, makes it easier for the clinician to compare cycles rather than rely on memory.

Questions about the record itself

Start by confirming facts, not interpretations. This prevents later confusion about what was actually done.

  • Can you walk me through the cycle summary line by line?
  • Which numbers in this summary are most relevant to how this cycle went, and why?
  • Were there any points where the plan changed, and what prompted the change?
  • Is anything in my record incomplete or still pending?

Questions about the explanation

This is where previous outcomes and the doctor explanation meet. Ask for the reasoning, not only the conclusion.

  • What do you think contributed to this cycle not resulting in a pregnancy?
  • How confident are you in that view, and what else could explain it?
  • Which parts are known from my results, and which parts are your clinical judgement?
  • Is there anything we simply cannot know from this cycle?
  • Are there findings you would want to look at again or discuss with a colleague?

It helps to repeat the explanation back in your own words and ask the clinician to correct anything you have misunderstood. If a term is unfamiliar, ask for it in plain language.

Questions about what would change

A review is more useful when it moves from explanation to options. Ask what would be done differently and on what basis.

  • What, if anything, would you change about the protocol or approach next time?
  • What is the reasoning behind that change, and what would it be intended to address?
  • What would you keep the same, and why?
  • Are there options we have not yet discussed?
  • What are the trade-offs of each option, including the burdens and the uncertainties?

Questions about further investigations

Extra tests are only worth doing if the result would change a decision. Ask about that link directly.

  • Are you considering any further investigations before another cycle?
  • For each one, what question would it answer, and what would we do differently depending on the result?
  • What are the limitations or possible misleading results of that test?
  • If a test is not recommended, what is the reason?

If genetic testing of embryos was part of your cycle, ask specifically what the report did and did not establish. A result from a small sample of cells is not the same as a confirmed diagnosis for the whole embryo, and the clinician and genetic counsellor should explain the relevant uncertainty. The HFEA notes that PGT-A assesses chromosome number in sampled cells and has limitations, and that a result does not guarantee a successful pregnancy or a healthy child. Where a mosaic finding has been reported, the ASRM committee opinion explains that such a result is inferred from intermediate findings in a biopsy sample, technical factors can contribute, and a sampled result does not establish the cell composition of the whole embryo.

Questions about timing and practical next steps

  • Is there a medical reason to wait before another attempt, and how long?
  • What would you want to have in place before we start again?
  • What should I do if I have questions after this appointment?
  • Who will send me the updated summary, and when should I expect it?

Questions about uncertainty and a second opinion

It is reasonable to leave some questions open. Naming them is part of a good review.

  • Which of your answers are firm, and which are provisional?
  • Would you support a second opinion, and what records should I send?
  • Is there anything you would want me to raise with another specialist?

After the appointment: close the loop

Before you leave, ask for the written summary and check that it matches what you understood. Note any answers that were left open, and who will follow up. If you are travelling home afterwards, confirm how results and follow-up questions will be handled remotely.

If organising records, requesting a remote review appointment or coordinating follow-up questions is the part you would rather not manage alone, you can describe the task and ask what coordination support is available. Scope and any fees are confirmed individually, and clinical interpretation stays with your treating clinicians.

Frequently asked questions

Should I ask for a written summary of the cycle?

Yes. A written summary lets you check the details later and share them with another clinician if you seek a second opinion. Ask who will prepare it and when it will be sent.

What if the clinician cannot explain why the cycle failed?

Sometimes no single cause can be identified from one cycle. Ask which parts are known from your results, which are clinical judgement and which remain uncertain, and what further information might narrow that uncertainty.

Can I ask about my individual chances?

You can ask a licensed clinician about your individual situation, including how your results and history may affect your options. Ask them to explain the basis for any estimate and how much uncertainty surrounds it.

Evidence trail

Sources & verification

Review current primary information and reconfirm provider services, fees and eligibility before booking.

01HFEA: Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) ↗02ASRM: Clinical management of mosaic PGT-A results (2023) ↗

Your next practical step

Bring your coordination questions.

Ask about appointments, records, travel or the practical arrangements for your visit.

Ask about coordination support →